China Android app stores App Review issue

Personal info collection rules in China Android app stores

The store flagged the app because personal-information collection, scope limitation, or disclosure detail does not meet China Android app stores review expectations.

china android personal info collection ruleschina app personal information rulesandroid china privacy collection

Fix China Android app stores review issues before the next submission

Use LogicSpring to run a free precheck, regenerate the right policy or disclosure pack, and shorten the loop from rejection notice to resubmission.

Summary

The store flagged the app because personal-information collection, scope limitation, or disclosure detail does not meet China Android app stores review expectations.

What this means

Stores expect personal-information collection to be necessary, transparent, and limited to the declared purpose.

The policy and prompts should explain what is collected, why it is needed, and whether third parties receive it.

This is a core launch issue for most submissions to China Android app stores.

Common causes

  • The app collects more fields than are obviously needed for the feature or explains them too vaguely.
  • The privacy policy, permission prompts, and SDK disclosures describe different collection scopes.
  • Retention, sharing, or user-rights explanations are missing or too generic.

Step-by-step fix

  1. Step 1

    Map each personal-information field to a necessary feature-level purpose and remove unnecessary collection.

  2. Step 2

    Rewrite policy, prompts, and store materials so the same collection scope appears everywhere.

  3. Step 3

    Check vendor and SDK disclosures so third-party collection is not omitted.

What to update

  • Chinese Privacy Policy
  • Permission prompts
  • Store disclosure materials
  • SDK vendor list

FAQ

Can I resubmit to China Android app stores without changing the binary?

Only for pure listing or form corrections. If the shipped build still requests the wrong permission, bundles the wrong SDK, or behaves inconsistently, resubmitting the same build is risky.

What evidence should I prepare before resubmitting?

Prepare the updated public policy URL, the exact store fields you changed, screenshots for permission or disclosure flows where relevant, and a short reviewer note explaining what changed and why it now matches the app.

Should the privacy policy, store form, and in-app disclosure all match?

Yes. Review teams compare these surfaces together. If one says you collect or disclose something and another says you do not, the mismatch itself often becomes the next rejection.