Summary
China Android app stores rejected the app because the third-party SDK disclosure list is missing, incomplete, or inconsistent with the shipped app and policy.
China Android app stores App Review issue
China Android app stores rejected the app because the third-party SDK disclosure list is missing, incomplete, or inconsistent with the shipped app and policy.
Use LogicSpring to run a free precheck, regenerate the right policy or disclosure pack, and shorten the loop from rejection notice to resubmission.
China Android app stores rejected the app because the third-party SDK disclosure list is missing, incomplete, or inconsistent with the shipped app and policy.
Major China Android app stores often expect a structured SDK vendor list, not just a generic sentence in the privacy policy.
Reviewers want vendor names, purposes, data categories, and sometimes permission mapping for each SDK.
This is a common failure point for global teams reusing a minimal western launch package.
Build a full SDK inventory that includes vendor name, purpose, personal information categories, and related permissions.
Update the Chinese privacy policy and store-facing declarations from that inventory.
Recheck the final build so the package reflects exactly what ships.
Typically vendor name, SDK purpose, the types of personal information involved, related permissions, and often the vendor privacy policy URL. Some stores also expect the list to be separate from the main privacy policy.
Often no. Many China Android app stores want a structured vendor-level disclosure artifact in addition to the privacy policy, especially when the app bundles push, login, analytics, advertising, or payment SDKs.
Review in China Android app stores is usually more explicit about vendor-level SDK lists and permission mapping. A western-style policy and console form set is often not enough on its own.