Summary
Google rejected the app because health-related permissions, data declarations, or user-benefit explanations are incomplete or unsupported.
Google Play App Review issue
Google rejected the app because health-related permissions, data declarations, or user-benefit explanations are incomplete or unsupported.
Use LogicSpring to run a free precheck, regenerate the right policy or disclosure pack, and shorten the loop from rejection notice to resubmission.
Google rejected the app because health-related permissions, data declarations, or user-benefit explanations are incomplete or unsupported.
Health data permissions and health-related data categories are treated as higher-risk and need extra justification.
Google expects a narrow use case, strong user-facing explanation, and accurate Data Safety coverage.
If the app is AI-enabled, reviewers may scrutinize how health data is processed or inferred.
Document the exact health-data use case and remove any health-related access that is not central to the feature.
Update policy, Data Safety, and in-app disclosures with explicit health-data handling language.
Prepare reviewer notes and screenshots that show how the user consents before health data is accessed.
Only for pure listing or form corrections. If the shipped build still requests the wrong permission, bundles the wrong SDK, or behaves inconsistently, resubmitting the same build is risky.
Prepare the updated public policy URL, the exact store fields you changed, screenshots for permission or disclosure flows where relevant, and a short reviewer note explaining what changed and why it now matches the app.
Yes. Review teams compare these surfaces together. If one says you collect or disclose something and another says you do not, the mismatch itself often becomes the next rejection.